Which of the following is NOT a reason the Local Finance Board can take over the supervision of a municipality?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Improve your knowledge of the Municipal Budget Process. Familiarize yourself with key concepts and terminology through multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

The correct answer highlights that a high tax collection rate is not a reason for the Local Finance Board to take over supervision of a municipality. A high tax collection rate generally indicates effective financial management and is a sign of fiscal health, suggesting that the municipality is successfully collecting its revenues.

In contrast, the other scenarios outlined involve situations where a municipality is exhibiting financial distress or failing to meet certain legal standards. For instance, when a municipality's debt exceeds 3.5% of the equalized value, this raises red flags about its financial stability. Similarly, a judge determining a lack of compliance with local laws signals potential legal issues that could impact financial governance. Defaulting on payment of bonds and notes directly indicates a severe financial crisis, warranting intervention.

Therefore, while the Local Finance Board likely aims to intervene in situations indicating poor financial management or legal compliance issues, a high tax collection rate does not present such a concern and would not trigger a takeover of supervision.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy